Do schools kill creativity?
Started by Mizu, Jul 18 2011 11:28 PM
8 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 18 July 2011 - 11:28 PM
I'll plop this in this sub-forum just because it deals with such.
Are the Petroglyph developers still alive? Your thoughts on it? How about those that used to draw or submit stuff here? What are your thoughts? I sure as hell will vouch that schools do kill creativity, even if they say they add to it...slightly.
Are the Petroglyph developers still alive? Your thoughts on it? How about those that used to draw or submit stuff here? What are your thoughts? I sure as hell will vouch that schools do kill creativity, even if they say they add to it...slightly.
#3
Posted 03 August 2011 - 11:10 PM
There's no short term profit in what he says, so the law of averages says it will take a long time for his point of view to come across and really have any impact.
Humans reckon in the immediate. He may be right, but it will take time for pre-unversity education to value a mind instead of evauluating it's usefulness.
Humans reckon in the immediate. He may be right, but it will take time for pre-unversity education to value a mind instead of evauluating it's usefulness.
#4
Posted 03 August 2011 - 11:51 PM
Mizu, on 18 July 2011 - 11:28 PM, said:
How about those that used to draw or submit stuff here? What are your thoughts? I sure as hell will vouch that schools do kill creativity, even if they say they add to it...slightly.
Current education systems don't kill creativity, they just keep a tight reign it because left unchecked, people do all sorts of stupid things and pass it off as creativity while forgetting that the very point of something being creative in the first place is that it has to be of value, not just something new and original.
Edited by Valdez, 03 August 2011 - 11:52 PM.

#5
Posted 08 August 2011 - 10:53 AM
I like the statement "She's a dancer". It's better than the current popular idea that "she just needs to be taught mathematics visually or aurally".
Personally, I'm not a creative person (unless I'm designing a data structure), so I can't really relate to the ideas of education inflation, or being incompatible with conventional teaching or syllabi.
Val: In a free market, "artists" who don't make art would either learn to change, or be Darwinized. I suppose it's the job of the parents to make sure that their kids understand this... though, as the guy in the video said, this leads to lots of "don't do music, you won't make a living from it. Why not study law instead?".
As far as I can tell, the function of a degree in fine arts/music/drama is to teach better techniques (and, I presume, to meet people and built connections, like with any other degree). I don't know the purpose of a generic arts degree.
Personally, I'm not a creative person (unless I'm designing a data structure), so I can't really relate to the ideas of education inflation, or being incompatible with conventional teaching or syllabi.
Val: In a free market, "artists" who don't make art would either learn to change, or be Darwinized. I suppose it's the job of the parents to make sure that their kids understand this... though, as the guy in the video said, this leads to lots of "don't do music, you won't make a living from it. Why not study law instead?".
As far as I can tell, the function of a degree in fine arts/music/drama is to teach better techniques (and, I presume, to meet people and built connections, like with any other degree). I don't know the purpose of a generic arts degree.
#6
Posted 10 January 2012 - 10:04 AM
It is a good question. I think everything depends on a certain teacher, their attitude and approach, their tasks. Personally, I was lucky with my teachers at school, and I got more creative tasks since the others as I attended a poetry club and started writing poetry and prose then.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





















