[CuppaLastHumanSoldier]

1.In WW C&C3 would Nod get more Tiberium/Alien technology based weapons?
2.How come not until 2002 a C&C game got 3D graphics?
3.How come the game always followed the GDI endings?

This post has been edited by CuppaLastHumanSoldier: 03 July 2007 - 11:45 AM

[Ishmael]

CuppaLastHumanSoldier, on Jul 3 2007, 09:31 AM, said:

1.In WW C&C3 would Nod get more Tiberium/Alien technology based weapons?

There's lots of posts on C&C3 stuff already -- search the forum and you'll learn about some of the WW C&C3 stuff.

Quote

2.How come not until 2002 a C&C game got 3D graphics?

Because 3D doesn't make RTS games any better. Most of the stuff you can do in 3D is easier to do in 2D. There's other posts on this as well.

Quote

3.How come the game always followed the GDI endings?

Simply because the planet was so messed up after the Nod endings that we didn't have enough room to continue the series forward without some head-scratching continuity problems. Going with Nod's endings would also have put GDI as the weak, scrappy side, which messes with the faction's philosophy a bit too much between games.

[popcorn2008]

And and that the topic shall close